The unemployment saga continues.
My partner and I applied for two government positions recently. We both interviewed for the same position approximately one month ago. We were both invited to interview for another position this week, although this position is of a slightly higher pay grade than the last one.
At the end of the first interview one of the people on the panel told my partner, somewhat rudely, that he had “a lot of research experience”, but that the position wasn’t a research-oriented position. Translation: “Find a research job”. But there are no research jobs. And he’s tried, and tried, and tried (see my other post: ” Underemployed with the Government“).
We were also told that we would be informed as to whether we would be offered the position in “approximately two weeks”. Of course neither one of us was told anything either way, as we’ve noticed is typical of potential employers to just ignore a person following a job interview if the potential employer is not interested. So we both went into the interview this week having absolutely no idea as to whether we were still being considered for the other position or not. I have a fair bit of experience, but my partner has a lot of very relevant education and experience for the positions, and really, there isn’t much possibility that there could be anyone more qualified for either job if you ask me.
Many of the questions asked during the previous interview we had were repeated for this week’s interview. I should also mention that the interview panel was 15-20 minutes late in calling me, and no one thought to apologize or give a reason as to why. At the end, I asked the panel if any candidate was chosen for the other position (first one for which we interviewed). They replied that no decision was made and that I would be informed later but I should still send in my references in case they decide to consider hiring me for the position (sure).
A few hours later, both my partner and I received an e-mail informing us that we were unsuccessful in obtaining the last position, but that we should still go ahead and apply for future positions. Translation: “Thanks for being qualified enough to apply so we can waste your time interviewing you for two positions, even though we already know who we want to hire”. I especially liked that the person who answered my question about whether anyone had been hired yet, lied to my face (okay, over the telephone), as in actual fact a decision had been made with respect to who was offered the position. When the folks on the panel realized that they hadn’t actually bothered to inform all of the candidates as I pointed out to them, they sent an e-mail as promised.
What’s funny is that part of the interview consisted of behavioural type questions, for, you know, collecting information about how well a candidate would work with others. Well, a good way to build a relationship with other people is by not lying to them. But since they can’t even follow their own rule or do their own jobs, I don’t understand how anyone should be expected to work with such hypocrites. But, since they know they have the monopoly on good pensions, benefits and overall job security, they know people are clamouring to get their feet in the door and alas, they do whatever the hell they want.
Honestly, people should just be appointed to positions because government hiring managers operate like everyone else and will just hire the person they like/know anyway. It’s a waste of time for both sides to pretend to consider all the candidates, and frankly, at the end we just end up feeling used in the process since we know our qualifications don’t count for shit. Please, just make nepotism and cronyism acceptable practices. It is way more efficient.
It’s why we’re screwed.